AI transparency
AI assists. Clinicians decide.
Where configured, AI may prepare editable content from selected evidence. A clinician reviews it before publication.
- 1Source selectedReviewed clinic information
- 2Draft preparedEditable, not published
- 3Clinician reviewDecision remains with the clinician
- 4PublishSeparate authorized action
Use only configured evidence types.
Typed information and supported documents, audio, or images may be processed where configured. Current formats and limits are stated on the session feedback page.
- SessionFeedback capturedTyped note and supported evidence
- ReviewClinician confirmsSource and proposal stay distinct
- RecordNext work stays connectedGoals, reports, and family updates
Separate processing from decisions.
Extraction and transcription prepare source material. An AI proposal is a separate step. Neither is a clinical decision.
Treat every proposal as editable.
A proposal can be incomplete or wrong. The clinician compares it with its source, then edits, rejects, or confirms it.
- Source
Available evidence stays identifiable.
- Proposal
Processing or AI may prepare material.
- Clinician review
A person compares, edits, rejects, or confirms.
- Publish
An authorized person makes the final action explicit.
Keep review and publication human-led.
Only a permitted clinician decides what becomes dependable clinical information. Publication requires a separate authorized action.
Set a clear AI boundary.
- AI does not diagnose, score, choose treatment, reach clinical conclusions, clinically approve, or publish on its own.
Govern providers and retention.
Provider selection and retention are governed product decisions. The current high-level provider role is disclosed; region, training use, and exact retention details are not stated until approved.
Keep the explanation current.
This explanation was reviewed on 28 August 2026. Ask a non-clinical question or see the workflow with your clinic.